According to Wade & MacPherson, which of the following is not an advantage of specialized units?

According to Wade & MacPherson, which of the following is not an advantage of specialized units?

• A. A reduction in patrol coverage
• B. Improved incident response times
• C. Better resource allocation
• D. Increased interagency cooperation

Answer: (B)

Specialized units provide focused capabilities, which can improve how resources are used and strengthen cooperation with other agencies that handle similar tasks. However, pulling officers into specialized teams often means less patrol presence overall, and coordinating or mobilizing those units can add steps before a response is underway. Because of this activation and redeployment process, incident response times are not inherently reduced; in many cases they may not improve at all. That mix of trade-offs is why the idea that responses are quicker isn’t considered a guaranteed advantage of having specialized units.

Specialized units provide focused capabilities, which can improve how resources are used and strengthen cooperation with other agencies that handle similar tasks. However, pulling officers into specialized teams often means less patrol presence overall, and coordinating or mobilizing those units can add steps before a response is underway. Because of this activation and redeployment process, incident response times are not inherently reduced; in many cases they may not improve at all. That mix of trade-offs is why the idea that responses are quicker isn’t considered a guaranteed advantage of having specialized units.